by: Yasmin Ajirniar From mid-summer to late fall of 2015, the cosmopolitan city of Milan hosted the World Expo towards the northeast of its city center. There, the sleekest designs and most novel technology was featured to the theme of “Feeding the planet, Energy for life”. Regarding the non-traditional energy concerns, a collaboration between Merck and Belectric, called the solar trees, inhabited the German Pavilion; It was an installation that was not only symbolic in its design but also suggestive in its technological feat. The large semi-transparent arching structures that captured the spirit of the “Field of Ideas” were erected from printed organic materials that could harvest electricity from solar energy. Most excitingly, the science of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) behind the World Expo spectacle is not too far away from being more widely incorporated.
Unlike silicon based solar cells, acceptor-donor polymers and small molecules such as fullerenes comprise the carbon-based systems of OPV’s such that they create a mobile electron and an electron hole—a free charge carrier. The cascade of events that lead to the free charge carrier begins with the absorption of a photon. Highly conjugated polymers then donate the resultant exciton, the electrostatically bound electron and electron hole, to a small molecule electron acceptor. In the process of transferring the electron, an energetic difference between the two materials splits the exciton; thus arriving at the free charge carrier. Unfortunately, because the charge mobility of these systems is limited, the efficiency of OPV’s has not yet reached that of inorganic solar cells. While inorganic materials typically achieve an efficiency of 15-22%, organic materials were once reported, at most, to be 14%. However, within the last two years, an efficiency of 17.3% was reported by using new architectures, such as tandem cells (cells which split the range of the spectrum of incoming photons). Inherent to the nature of the material, OPV’s do have a significant advantage over their counterparts such that the low cost and variety in synthetic techniques. For example, while, on average, traditional silicon solar cells cost 10.5 cents per kilowatt-hour, producing electricity from an OPV solar cell would cost 7 cents per kilowatt-hour, according to a BBC environmental correspondant's report in 2018. Further, greater tunability and diversity can be achieved in polymer synthesis. Because thiophenes have unique photochemical properties that lend themselves useful in the construction of organic solar cells, synthetic techniques, such as the Hinsberg Thiophene Ring Synthesis and use of Lawesson’s Reagent, are particularly relevant. In addition, the facile incorporation of organic solar cells into existing infrastructure not only enables wider implementation but also reduces installation costs. Compare rooftop solar panels: since silicon based solar panels are so heavy that they require sufficient structural support from roofs, installing these panels, and perhaps installing new framework to withstand the added weight, can be very costly. However, with dyes and inks containing the absorbers and/or polymers, thin, lightweight organic panels can be printed, manipulated, and readily installed at a lower cost and disturbance to the existing structure. A clear, or rather semi-transparent, demonstration of innovation, design, and practicality behind organic photovoltaics, the curved, patterned solar trees of the World Expo appropriately embody the “seedlings” that would grow and disseminate. While the exposition was a feat for the 2015 World Expo, it is probable and beneficial to pursue research, production, and integration of OPV solar cells. Although efficiency of organic systems has historically been less than that of inorganic systems, new architectures have increased their efficiency. And given the low cost of harvesting electricity, tunability, low weight, and high flexibility, the future of OPV’s looks promising.
15 Comments
Connor Becker
6/12/2019 05:14:43 pm
Very interesting read. I was pleased to see a new way to use solar energy that can hopefully be developed even more to surpass the efficiency of inorganic. As scientists and engineers, we must always be looking to optimize structures and technologies that already exist. Doing so benefits something much bigger. That something being the environment and all the life that exists within it. It is exciting to see organic solar technology due to its tentative lower cost. The typical person would not think to invest in such a technology for either their home or business unless it is to the maximum economic benefit. The fact that we can lower the cost and improve the efficiency is absolutely phenomenal. I think it is very important for the public to become aware of such innovations, so that they can too realize what strides are being taken to solve a climate crisis. With more public news on projects like this could go a really long way to gaining followers. I look forward to seeing this solar technology develop into something even greater than what it already is.
Reply
Hamza Abdelaziz
14/12/2019 04:03:35 pm
The title really caught my eye. From what I learned in chemistry this year, i believe that there are many ways to treat climate change, and the most efficient way is by using renewable energy. We could stop burning fossil fuels, gas usage to prevent climate change. some industries already starting to rely on renewable energy, such as space x, and car companies. :)
Reply
Ike
17/12/2019 09:19:01 am
I agree completely, I feel that if efficient and cost friendly use of renewable resources is the only way to battle climate change. As long as the rate of production for these resources is parallel to that of burning fossil fuels.
Shelly Oerman
9/12/2019 08:14:23 am
I read this article and was excited to learn about new technology that's being used. It really gives me hope. We should be able to produce these "solar trees" efficiently so future generations can use them accordingly. As we speak millions of people burn fossil fuels without considering how negatively it will affect our planet. These trees can lead other companies into using clean energy in the future and we can keep our planet healthy.
Reply
Sarah Smith
10/12/2019 07:24:09 am
The title really grabbed my attention. I think it is really cool and also innovative that they made the solar panels into a structural work of art for both the people and the Earth to enjoy! I was also very surprised by the infrastructure of normal solar panel on the roof and the high costs.
Reply
Nick Fioravante
10/12/2019 10:32:36 am
The title really caught my attention in this article. I am very interested in ways to create cleaner and better energy. The article really outlined some new innovative ways to create cleaner and better energy.
Reply
Elizabeth Ulmer
11/12/2019 11:28:47 am
I always find it really interesting how renewable energy sources are always evolving and still even becoming more environmentally friendly. Finding and adapting renewable energy sources is extremely important for the future of the environment and society, especially in this day and age where climate change is still debated by some major political influences. Not only is this new technology super cool and interesting, it is also physically appealing which could influence the decisions of introducing them into cities where curb appeal is a big factor.
Reply
Kyle Beelitz
11/12/2019 03:30:06 pm
This was a well written article, for it highlights the strides of developing technology that would benefit our world. Not only does this new technology provide another solution in renewable energy, but this breakthrough is shown to be a superior alternative to the presently used solar cells. This article calls attention to how these solar trees are less expensive and easier to install than solar panels on rooftops. Advantages like these are not only good for the environment, but are additionally positive for the organizations or individuals who make use of this energy source. I hope politicians, civil engineers, and scientists can work together to advance and exercise this development. This development in the science field is promising, and am anticipating more communities to utilize this technology.
Reply
Liam Smith
12/12/2019 06:29:57 am
This was an interesting article to read. I think it is great that we are spreading the practice of clean energy through these newer methods. The title of this article caught my attention as I find the studies in cleaner, more efficient energy intriguing. It does make sense that as of right now the organic materials being used have shown to be less efficient than those of the inorganic materials. This is only because of the newness of the practice. As this topic and practice is used and studied more, I know that scientists and engineers will be able to make the most of this organic material and better our practices with green energy.
Reply
Grant Kern
13/12/2019 01:22:02 pm
I think it is cool how they make solar energy into different forms of structures. The structures are visually pleasing to people. They can make it less obvious that there are solar panels there that are generating energy. I wonder how many more different structures will come out in the future? It will be cool to see all of the different designs that people make and build. For now, I think the solar trees are a really cool thing to have in modern urban areas and cities. They add a visually pleasing effect and also generate energy to help the city. Solar energy needs to be used more and throughout the future in order to keep our Earth clean and prosperous.
Reply
Haley Berkebile
16/12/2019 01:08:39 pm
I immediately was interested due to the title and image chosen for the article. As our society seems to move towards a new modern outlook, it is pleasing to see how solar panels have been approached at by a technical and design outlook. The panels themselves not only are functional, but also provide beautiful structures for the eye to see. What makes this so astonishing to me is how the panels are a free-charge carrier, and despite seeming so technologically advanced, the cost is 7 cents per kilowatt-hour while traditional silicon solar cells are 10.5 cents per kilowatt-hour. While many people think the cost of solar panels outweighs the benefits, this statement is based strictly on opinion because clearly as shown in the article, organic solar cells are environmentally friendly, an advancement in infrastructure, and will overall lead to a cleaner society.
Reply
Keegan Rahman
16/12/2019 07:08:07 pm
This is absolutely incredible to see man base his designs upon nature, but this time on such a complex scale, trying to improve on the organic biological reaction with the most mind-boggling scale- photosynthesis. The similarities between naturally evolved organisms and man-made machines is a testament to the humble qualities of mankind, not only wanting to appreciate nature by moving to more resource friendly energy production, but also basing that production on the work of billions of years of photosynthesis. In my opinion the most incredible thing about these subtle similarities if the use of electron transport, just as though it was phosphorylation in the chloroplast. Absolutely beautiful and humbling to see the future of our civilization unfold in front of us, here's to hoping we can protect the world's ecosystems. I hope to see this technology in the news being utilized on a larger scale at some point, keep up the good work!
Reply
Anna F.
16/12/2019 07:43:08 pm
The solar trees in this article are amazing. It is also good news that they give customers cheaper electricity per kilowatt-hour and they are cheaper to put up. I hope in the future this technology will come out in other parts of the world so that more people can afford to use cleaner energy.
Reply
Sarah Stark
16/12/2019 08:44:24 pm
I love learning about the new technology that is becoming more and more available. Are the solar systems expensive to build and implement? The organic OPV is slightly less efficient, but it is a cheaper way to produce energy. What is the known most efficient way to harness the light's energy? Are the photosystems in plants the most efficient? Are tandem cells more expensive to produce than the OPV and the inorganic solar cells? How likely would it be for that OPV or tandem solar cells could ever be used by individuals such as how some have solar panels on their roof? As I mentioned, earlier I love learning about the new more efficient technology and I read that much of the unharnessed energy is in the oceans. I was wondering what advancements had been made in this area of research and what companies were fore fronting the research.
Reply
Mackenzie Quinn
17/12/2019 09:30:50 am
This is such a good idea to help reduce climate change. From what I’ve learned in chemistry this year that climate change is a big issue that is concerning many people. This is a great idea to have solar trees. Solar panels are a great renewable energy resource and many people are starting to use more of them. If everyone could, I think everyone should try out the solar trees to help out with climate change. I can’t wait to see if this idea blows up :)
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|